II Ka 209/24
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal on sentencing, upholding original sentence for theft while ordering defendant to pay appeal costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal regarding the sentence but upheld the original conviction for theft. The defendant argued the penalty was disproportionately high, yet the court found no grounds to alter the judgment. Consequently, the ruling on the sentence stands, and the defendant must pay the court costs for the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 178a § 4 kk; Art. 438 § 3 k.p.k.: The court upheld the original sentence for theft where the appellate court found no error in factual findings or proportionality, thereby rejecting the appeal on sentencing.
Keywords
AI generated
theft sentencing
proportionality of penalty
appellate review
criminal appeal
court costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 178a § 4 kk
Art. 438 § 3 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 609/24
Appeal dismissed; defendant ordered to pay defense costs but waived due to financial hardship.
II Ka 281/24
Appeal court upheld conviction but ordered defendant to pay victim's legal fees.
III Ka 428/21
Appeal dismissed for excessive sentence; court rejected plea agreement and victim forgiveness as mitigating factors.
II Ka 935/21
Court dismissed prosecutor's appeal on procedural grounds, upholding acquittal and awarding defense costs.
IV Ka 9/22
Court partially allowed appeal, changing conviction from negligence to gross negligence for lifeguard's death risk.