II Ka 158/24
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld original sentence and ordered state to pay defense costs for indigent defendant.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal and upheld the original conviction and sentence. The defendant argued for a change in the ruling but raised no specific complaints regarding the facts or legal qualification. The court rejected these arguments and determined that the state must cover the defense costs incurred by the indigent defendant.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 624 k.p.k. in conjunction with Art. 634 k.p.k.: The appeal is rejected when the defendant fails to substantiate claims of factual error or disproportionality, and the state bears defense costs for indigent defendants under Art. 624 k.p.k. in conjunction with Art. 634 k.p.k.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
indigent defense
state costs
dismissed appeal
proportionality of sentence
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 624 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
§ 17 ust. 5 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 14 maja 2024 roku w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej udzielonej przez adwokata z urzędu
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 26/25
Appeal dismissed; sentence upheld; defendant's claim of excessive penalty rejected by court.
VI Ka 20/23
Appeal dismissed for excessive sentence; court found no gross disproportionality in the imposed penalty.
VI Ka 417/22
Appeal against conviction dismissed; court upholds original judgment on facts and procedure.
VI Ka 178/20
Criminal appeal court reduced civil compensation liability for the defendant due to financial hardship.
II AKa 161/22
Appeal court acquits defendants of assault charges but increases their combined prison sentence to five years.