Appeal dismissed; defendant's factual and proportionality claims rejected; state covers legal aid costs.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment regarding criminal charges and legal aid costs. The defendant argued for factual errors and excessive sentencing, while the defense requested a change in the ruling. The court found the appeals entirely unfounded and upheld the original verdict, noting that despite the defendant's financial hardship, the state would cover the legal aid expenses incurred during the appeal proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. in zw. z art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze; Art. 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 i § 4 ust. 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości: When an appeal is entirely unfounded, the defendant bears the costs, but the court may waive payment if the defendant's financial situation is difficult, with the state assuming the expense.