Court partially acquits defendant of fraud against creditors, finding insufficient evidence for two counts but guilty of obstructing court execution.

The court acquitted the defendant of two charges of fraud against creditors regarding the sale of a vehicle and agricultural property, finding the evidence insufficient to prove malicious intent to evade debt. However, the court convicted the defendant on a third charge of obstructing court execution due to the sale of another vehicle intended to satisfy a specific court judgment. The decision rests on the distinction between general insolvency evasion and the specific intent required to obstruct a final judicial ruling.