Court dismissed appeal regarding traffic ban extension, upholding conviction for repeated violation of driving prohibition.

The court dismissed the defendant's appeal against a judgment extending a driving ban from three to four years due to a repeated violation. The defendant argued for leniency based on mental impairment and financial hardship, but the court found the facts of the traffic stop and the expert opinion on cognitive limitations sufficient to establish guilt. Consequently, the court rejected the request for extraordinary leniency, citing the defendant's history of eight prior convictions as evidence of demoralization rather than a first-time offense.