II K 474/22
AI generated
Court dismisses criminal charges for property damage due to lack of criminal intent and minor value threshold.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court acquitted the defendant of charges for intentional property damage involving a car mirror valued at 903.61 PLN. The prosecution argued the defendant intentionally struck the mirror, but the court found no evidence of criminal intent, noting the defendant merely attempted to retrieve a dog he believed belonged to the victim. Furthermore, the court determined the damage value was so low that it fell below the threshold for criminal prosecution under the relevant statute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 288 § 1 kk; Art. 119 kw. 3.5: The court established that criminal liability for property damage requires proof of intent and that the value of the damage must exceed the statutory threshold for criminal offenses.
Keywords
AI generated
intentional property damage
criminal intent
property value threshold
acquittal
minor damage
dog ownership dispute
criminal procedure code
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 288 § 1 kk
Art. 119 kw. 3.5
Art. 1 § 1 kk
Art. 17 § 1 pkt 3 kpk
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 1392/23
Court grants conditional suspension for intentional vehicle damage, orders compensation to victim fund, and awards legal aid costs.
II K 73/15
Court imposes fine and damages order for intentional car damage by disabled woman, waiving costs.
VII W 348/13
Court finds driver guilty of careless backing causing damage and imposes a fine.
II K 799/21
Court imposed combined fine and damages for intentional property damage and assault in a Polish criminal case.
II K 347/17
Na podstawie całokształtu materiału dowodowego zgromadzonego w spawie, Sąd ustalił następujący stan faktyczny: Rodzina A.