II K 469/23
AI generated
Court sentenced defendant for violating contact ban and attempted entry, applying older law due to leniency.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of violating a contact ban and attempting unlawful entry, sentencing him to eight months of imprisonment. Although the prosecution requested a higher financial penalty, the court corrected a clerical error and applied the older, more lenient version of the law regarding the fine amount. The final judgment included the detention period as credit toward the total sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.: When a new law is in force at the time of judgment but the old law was more lenient for the offender, the court must apply the older law, considering all penal institutions to ensure the most favorable outcome for the accused.
Keywords
AI generated
principle of leniency
retroactive application of law
contact ban violation
attempted unlawful entry
combined punishment
financial compensation fine
court clerical error
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 244 k.k.
Art. 13 § 1 k.k.
Art. 193 k.k.
Art. 43a § 2 k.k.
Art. 14 § 1 k.k.
Art. 85 § 1 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała SN z dnia 12 marca 1996 r., I KZP 2/96
postanowienie SN z dnia 3 grudnia 2001 r., V KKN 67/01
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 794/23
Appeal dismissed; public prosecutor upheld sentence for theft and compensation claim rejected as damage extinguished.
IV Ka 819/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted theft due to lack of reasonable doubt.
II AKa 91/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for procedural errors without affecting verdict outcome.
II AKa 74/22
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k. – obraza przepisów prawa materialnego w zakresie kwalifikacji prawnej czynu przypisanego oskarżonemu art. 438 pkt 1a k.p.k. – obraza przepisów prawa materialnego w innym wypadku niż wskazany w art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k., chyba że pomimo błędnej podstawy prawnej orzeczenie odpowiada prawu
VI Ka 957/20
Appeal court modifies probation conditions by adding contact restrictions with the victim under Polish Criminal Code.