Court acquits defendant of alimentary duty evasion due to inability to earn income from injury and prison.

The court acquitted the defendant of the crime of evading alimentary obligations, finding that his actions did not constitute a criminal offense. Material facts established that the defendant suffered a severe hand fracture requiring surgery, was subsequently imprisoned, and lacked any savings or assets. The court ruled that these circumstances legally excluded the intent to evade payment, as he physically could not work and legally could not earn income during the relevant period.