Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II AKa 109/22 AI generated

Appeal court upholds conviction for attempted theft, rejecting procedural errors and factual disputes raised by defense.

Case Number II AKa 109/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance conviction for attempted theft against two defendants, rejecting the prosecutor's and defense's appeals. The defense argued for procedural errors under Article 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while the prosecutor contested factual findings regarding the theft attempt. The court found no material errors in the lower court's assessment of evidence or legal qualification, thus affirming the original sentence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 § 1, 2, 3 k.p.k.; The appellate court may uphold a first-instance judgment if the lower court correctly applied substantive law and facts, even if procedural objections are raised, provided no error influenced the verdict's substance.

Keywords

AI generated
attempted theft conviction Code of Criminal Procedure procedural error appeal factual findings review legal qualification error appellate court decision upholding first instance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 § 3 k.p.k.
Art. 280 § 2 k.k.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
art. 280 § 2 k.k
art. 64 § 1 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text