Court awarded damages for restoring prior state but dismissed earlier interest claims due to procedural timing.

The court granted the plaintiff's claim for damages necessary to restore the previous state of affairs, while rejecting the request for interest covering the period prior to the specific notice. The plaintiff argued for full compensation including backdated interest, but the opposing party contended that interest should only accrue from the date the precise clarifying letter was served. Consequently, the court ruled that interest is only payable from that specific service date, allowing the restoration claim but dismissing the earlier interest portion.