IV Ka 940/21
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's conviction based on reliable criminal register data and procedural compliance.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the defense against the first-instance conviction. The defendant argued errors in factual findings and procedural violations under Articles 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, while the prosecution maintained the conviction's validity. The court rejected these claims, relying on the unchallenged integrity of the National Criminal Register and finding no material impact from alleged procedural defects on the final judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; The appellate court may dismiss an appeal if the alleged errors in factual findings or procedural violations do not affect the substance of the judgment or if the evidence, such as official criminal register data, is deemed fully reliable.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
factual error standard
procedural violation impact
criminal register reliability
disproportionate penalty review
appellate jurisdiction scope
evidence admissibility
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
art.438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art.439 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 200 § 1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII KK 216/13
2 J. S. została oskarżona o popełnienie 24 przestępstw z art. 286 § 1 k.k. Orzekając w tym zakresie, Sąd Rejonowy wyrokiem z dnia 21 lutego 2012 r., w sprawie III K …/07, odnośnie czynów zarzuconych w pkt I – IX i XI – XXIV przyjął, że stanowią one ciąg przestępstw z art. 286 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 91 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 64 § 1 k.k. i za to wymierzył jej karę 3 lat i 6 miesięcy pozbawienia wolności. W zakresie czynu zarzuconego w pkt X aktu oskarżenia przyjął Sąd, że stanowi przestępstwo z art. 284 § 2 k.k. w zw. z art. 64 § 1 k.k. i za to wymierzył oskarżonej karę w rozmiarze 1 roku pozbawienia wolności.
II KK 183/11
Supreme Court quashes criminal appeal verdict for failing to consider all evidence under procedural law.
V KK 429/11
IV KK 150/10
III KK 297/05
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding witness testimony and defense counsel absence during special court proceedings.
II KK 212/15
Supreme Court quashes lower court acquittal due to procedural errors regarding witness testimony and expert opinion admissibility.
Related Decisions
AI generatedIX Ka 511/23
Court dismissed prosecutor's appeal on factual errors, upholding the suspended sentence for drunk driving.
IV Ka 786/24
Court dismissed appeal against expert opinion credibility assessment under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
IX Ka 458/22
Court partially allowed appeal regarding curatorship and damages calculation but dismissed excessive penalty claim.
IV Ka 1083/22
Formularz UK 2 Sygnatura akt IV Ka 1083/22 Załącznik dołącza się w każdym przypadku.
IV Ka 1036/23
Court modifies appeal to convict driver of death by negligence and reduces costs for losing parties.