I C 991/21
AI generated
Consumer debt claim dismissed due to expiration of the three-year limitation period under the Civil Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for unpaid consumer loan installments because the three-year limitation period had expired. The plaintiff failed to prove any interruption of this period, despite the defendant's non-appearance and the transfer of the debt to the plaintiff. Consequently, the court ruled that the claim was time-barred under the Civil Code without examining other merits.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 117 ust. 2 pkt 1 k.c.; Art. 118 k.c.: A claim against a consumer for business-related debts is subject to a three-year limitation period, which expires if not interrupted or suspended by the creditor.
Keywords
AI generated
limitation period
consumer protection
business debt
civil code
time bar
creditor rights
statute of limitations
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 117 ust. 2 pkt 1 k.c.
Art. 118 k.c.
Art. 243 ust. 2 k.p.c.
Art. 339 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Related Decisions
AI generatedVI GC 339/16
Court dismissed claim due to unproven assignment of debt and lack of authority evidence.
I C 656/15
Plaintiff's claim dismissed due to failure to prove standing and debt amount under Civil Code burden of proof rules.
I C 894/21
Consumer loan contract dispute dismissed; court upheld bank's right to charge fees on interest despite consumer protection claims.
I C 470/17
Court orders payment of debt and costs against defendant who failed to prove loan repayment.
I C 131/24
Court dismisses loan fund claim due to failure to prove contract validity and proper bank contract termination procedure.