II Ka 360/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove procedural errors or excessive sentence under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.

Case Number II Ka 360/23

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2023-07-17

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defense's appeal against a first-instance conviction for attempted theft. The defense argued for procedural violations and excessive sentencing, but the court found no grounds to alter the original judgment. Consequently, the conviction was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The defense's appeal is inadmissible if it fails to demonstrate procedural errors or a grossly disproportionate sentence that would justify overturning the first-instance verdict.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal procedural error excessive sentence court costs Polish Criminal Procedure Code dismissed appeal conviction upheld

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

art. 439 k.p.k

art. 201 k.p.k

art. 437 § 2 k.p.k