II Ka 270/23
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction and awarded defense counsel fees from the state.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction and sentence. The defense argued violations of substantive and procedural law, but the court found no grounds to overturn the judgment. Consequently, the court upheld the original verdict and ordered the state to pay the defense lawyer's fees.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 22 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych: The appeal is rejected when the first-instance judgment is legally sound and the defense's claims regarding errors in qualification, procedure, or facts are unfounded.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
dismissal of appeal
defense fees
state funding
procedural error
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 22 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 06 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 03 października 2016 r.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 4 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedIX Ka 461/20
Appeal dismissed; court rejects excessive penalty claim due to lack of evidence regarding defendant's inability to pay.
II AKa 320/22
Appeal court vacates first-instance judgment due to alleged judge impartiality but remands for retrial.
II Ka 160/26
wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Łukowie z dnia 18 grudnia 2025 r.
II Ka 660/21
Court partially allowed appeal by finding defendants guilty of receiving stolen goods under Polish Criminal Code.
II Ka 256/22
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Siedlcach z dnia 28 lutego 2022 r., sygn.