Court held that social reaction to personality rights violation is key for legal protection assessment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim regarding the violation of personality rights by the defendant. While the plaintiff argued personal distress, the court emphasized that the social reaction to the violation is the decisive factor for legal evaluation. Consequently, the judgment established that subjective feelings alone are insufficient without considering societal impact.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o ochronie dóbr osobistych; The court ruled that the social reaction to a violation of personality rights is the decisive factor for assessing the legality of the claim, not merely the subjective feeling of the claimant.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Decydujące znaczenie dla oceny zasadności twierdzenia o naruszeniu dobra osobistego ma nie tylko subiektywne odczucie osoby żądającej ochrony prawnej, ale to, jaką reakcję wywołuje w społeczeństwie to naruszenie.