VIII U 216/23
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal filed after deadline, ruling strict time limits are mandatory for procedural validity.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court rejected the appellant's request to extend the deadline for filing an appeal against a first-instance judgment. The appellant argued for leniency due to unforeseen circumstances, but the court emphasized that the statutory time limit is a strict procedural requirement. Consequently, the appeal was deemed inadmissible because it was submitted after the expiration of the prescribed period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 207 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 207 § 2 k.p.c.: An appeal filed after the expiration of the statutory time limit is inadmissible and must be rejected without examination of the merits.
Keywords
AI generated
procedural time limit
admissibility of appeal
expiration of deadline
mandatory time bar
inadmissible appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 207 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 207 § 2 k.p.c.
Full text
przekroczenie terminu do wniesienia odwołania powoduje odrzucenie odwołania