Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VIII U 216/23 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal filed after deadline, ruling strict time limits are mandatory for procedural validity.

Case Number VIII U 216/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the appellant's request to extend the deadline for filing an appeal against a first-instance judgment. The appellant argued for leniency due to unforeseen circumstances, but the court emphasized that the statutory time limit is a strict procedural requirement. Consequently, the appeal was deemed inadmissible because it was submitted after the expiration of the prescribed period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 207 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 207 § 2 k.p.c.: An appeal filed after the expiration of the statutory time limit is inadmissible and must be rejected without examination of the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural time limit admissibility of appeal expiration of deadline mandatory time bar inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 207 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 207 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

przekroczenie terminu do wniesienia odwołania powoduje odrzucenie odwołania