Court dismisses claim that contract performance requires the contractor to be physically present in Poland during the disputed period.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim arguing that contract performance necessitated the contractor's physical presence in Poland during the relevant timeframe. The defendant contended that the contractual obligations were fulfilled through remote work and digital deliverables without requiring on-site presence. The court ruled that the specific terms of the contract and the nature of the services allowed for performance outside Poland, rejecting the plaintiff's assertion of mandatory physical presence.