Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II C 1396/22 AI generated

Electronic credit contract conclusion via bank is exempt from Art. 46 ust. 3 of Payment Services Act.

Case Number II C 1396/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that Article 46, paragraph 3 of the Payment Services Act does not apply to credit contracts concluded electronically through a bank. The plaintiff argued the regulation should cover all electronic agreements, but the defendant contended that bank-mediated transactions fall under specific banking regulations. The court decided the provision is inapplicable because the law explicitly excludes such transactions from its scope.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 46 ust. 3 ustawy o usługach płatniczych; The provision does not apply to the conclusion of credit contracts via electronic banking.

Keywords

AI generated
Payment Services Act electronic banking credit contract statutory exclusion consumer protection financial regulation digital agreements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 46 ust. 3 ustawy o usługach płatniczych
Art. 46 ust. 3 ustawy o usługach płatniczych nie ma zastosowania do zawierania, za pośrednictwem bankowość elektronicznej, umów kredytu.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Art. 46 ust. 3 ustawy o usługach płatniczych nie ma zastosowania do zawierania, za pośrednictwem bankowość elektronicznej, umów kredytu.