Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II C 1366/22 AI generated

Bank's unilateral right to issue non-binding recommendations without liability is deemed abusive.

Case Number II C 1366/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declared the bank's internal regulation allowing unilateral issuance of non-binding recommendations without liability to be an abusive contractual clause. The bank argued this provision protected its operational flexibility, while the client contended it violated good faith principles by creating a significant imbalance. The court ruled that such a clause is void as it grants the bank excessive power without corresponding obligations, rendering the specific provision inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Bank Act; Civil Code: A contractual clause granting a bank the unilateral right to issue non-binding recommendations without liability is deemed abusive and void if it creates a significant imbalance between parties' rights and obligations.

Keywords

AI generated
abusive contractual clause bank unilateral power non-binding recommendations significant imbalance good faith principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Bank Act
Civil Code

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Postanowienie regulaminu banku, zgodnie z którym bank kiedy tylko zechce może wydać dowolnej treści rekomendacje lub zalecenia, których nie musi doręczyć swojemu klientowi a jeśli klient nie będzie się do nich stosował, bank nie będzie ponosił żadnej odpowiedzialności wobec klienta, jest skrajnie abuzywnym postanowieniem umownym.