I C 363/19
AI generated
Court dismisses claim for heating delivery costs, ruling general or lump-sum rules cannot be mixed.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's request for reimbursement of heating delivery costs to residential premises. The dispute arose from conflicting billing methods where the plaintiff argued for mixing general and lump-sum calculation principles. The court ruled that such mixing is inadmissible under the regulations, requiring adherence to either general or lump-sum rules exclusively.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o opłatach za dostawę i rozliczenie energii cieplnej; mixing general and lump-sum billing rules is inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generated
heating delivery costs
residential premises billing
lump-sum rules
general billing principles
inadmissible mixing
energy cost regulation
civil dispute resolution
Cited Legislation
AI generatedAct on Charges for Supply and Settlement of Heat Energy
Full text
nie jest dopuszczalne w regulaminie rozliczenie kosztów dostawy energii cieplnej do lokali mieszkalnych, mieszanie różnych sposobów rozliczania tych kosztów - można przyjąć albo zasady ogólne albo zasadę ryczałtowaną