Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XIII Ga 785/22 AI generated

Court rules local government income law does not cover road management funding and expert lacks required specialization.

Case Number XIII Ga 785/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding the funding of public road management by local government units. The plaintiff argued that Art. 3(1) of the Act on Income of Local Government Units applied, while the defendant contended the law does not cover road administration. The court held the statute does not apply directly and found the expert lacked the necessary special knowledge outside their specialization.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o dochodach jednostek samorządowych; Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o biegłych: The provision on local government income does not directly apply to road management funding, and an expert must possess special knowledge in the specific field of the opinion requested.

Keywords

AI generated
local government income road management funding expert specialization administrative appeal public roads

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o dochodach jednostek samorządowych
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o dochodach jednostek samorządowych nie odnosi się wprost do finansowania zarządu drogami publicznymi.
Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o biegłych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o dochodach jednostek samorządowych nie odnosi się wprost do finansowania zarządu drogami publicznymi. Biegły wpisany na listę Prezesa SO nie posiada wiadomości specjalnych w zakresie nie objętym jego specjalizacją.