II Ka 56/23
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal on procedural grounds, upholding original conviction for attempted theft under Polish Criminal Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce upheld the first-instance conviction for attempted theft against the defendant J. T. The defense and the victim's legal representative appealed, citing potential errors in factual findings and procedural violations under Articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court found no merit in these arguments, rejecting the claims that the lower court's factual determinations or procedural conduct affected the verdict's substance.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 633, 636 k.p.k.; The appellate court may dismiss an appeal if the alleged errors in factual findings or procedural violations do not have an impact on the content of the judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
attempted theft
criminal appeal
factual findings error
procedural violation
costs of proceedings
Code of Criminal Procedure
upholding conviction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 636 k.p.k.
art. 633 k.p.k.
art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 12 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 13 ust. 2 zasad
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 871/25
Court dismissed appeal against criminal conviction, upholding original judgment on facts and sentencing.
VI Ka 440/22
Appeal dismissed; probation period expired, triggering mandatory dismissal of proceedings under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
II Ka 979/21
Court quashes traffic accident conviction for failure to observe pedestrian crossing and speed limits.
IX Ka 130/25
Court quashes lower court verdict for factual error regarding defendant's document submission date and remands case.
VI Ka 72/24
Appeal upheld for drug offense; defense costs awarded to state; defendant exempted from court fees due to prison status.