II Ka 168/23
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against conviction for economic information disclosure, upholding first-instance sentence and costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce upheld the first-instance conviction and sentence against the defendant K. P. for disclosing economic information. The defendant appealed the judgment but failed to substantiate any procedural errors or factual mistakes under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the Regional Court rejected the appeal, maintaining the original verdict and ordering the defendant to pay court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; An appeal against a criminal conviction is dismissed when the appellant fails to demonstrate any error in the application of law or facts that could affect the judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
economic information disclosure
criminal appeal procedure
upholding first instance verdict
court costs allocation
lack of appeal grounds
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII KK 466/18
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for drunk motorbike driving, citing sufficient evidence and lack of procedural errors.
V KK 94/22
Supreme Court dismisses defense requests to recuse judges after cassation appeal is already rejected. The procedural stage has ended, making further recusal requests unnecessary and inadmissible.
V KK 321/15
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against drug trafficking sentence but vacates co-defendant's portion for remand.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 340/24
Court dismissed defense appeal against conviction for theft, upholding first-instance judgment on facts and law.
II Ka 581/24
Court partially allows appeal to increase damages, dismissing other procedural arguments while granting cost exemption.
II Ka 282/21
Court dismissed appeal on sentencing, upholding joint sentence despite defense's claim of disproportionate punishment compared to prior record.
VII Ka 579/25
Appeal court revoked probation for robbery conviction due to procedural error and excessive sentence.
II Ka 653/22
Appeal dismissed; first-instance conviction upheld; defendant exempted from costs due to poverty and substitute imprisonment.