II Ka 160/23
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; lower court sentence upheld; costs awarded to state for procedural error.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the victim's representative against the first-instance judgment. The appellant argued for a procedural violation under Article 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, claiming the lower court's decision was flawed. The appellate court found no merit in these claims and upheld the original sentence while ordering the appellant to pay court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 13 ust. 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The appellate court upheld the first-instance judgment when the appeal fails to demonstrate a procedural error affecting the verdict's substance.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
procedural error
upholding sentence
court costs
victim's representative
Code of Criminal Procedure
dismissed appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 13 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 133/22
Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie, wyrok z dnia 9 grudnia 2021r., sygn.
II Ka 25/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction as evidence sufficiently proved fraud against victims C.G. and B.S.
IX Ka 1208/23
Court modifies sentence by removing 'trivial motive' phrasing and reducing prison terms for three defendants.
VI Ka 467/21
Criminal court acquits defendant of theft by finding lack of criminal intent due to reliance on deposit retention rights.
VI Ka 440/22
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Jeleniej Górze z dnia 13 maja 2022r.