Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI Ka 750/22 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's procedural error and defense fee claim upheld; defendant exempted from costs.

Case Number VI Ka 750/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal against the first-instance judgment, upholding the conviction and the order for the lawyer to pay defense fees. The defense argued for a change in the verdict based on procedural errors, but the court found no such impact on the trial's outcome. Consequently, the court ruled that the defense lawyer must cover the costs of the defense while exempting the defendant from paying court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal based on procedural errors that did not affect the trial's outcome is rejected, and the defense lawyer remains liable for defense fees while the defendant is exempted from court costs.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure defense lawyer liability procedural error impact court costs exemption defense fee claim appellate review standard public prosecution costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 29 ust. 1 of the Lawyers Act
Art. 624 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 634 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
art. 226 § 1 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text