IV K 196/21
AI generated
Court dismisses claim for misappropriation of entrusted property of significant value due to lack of evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim alleging misappropriation of entrusted property of significant value. The plaintiff argued that the defendant failed to return assets worth substantial amounts, while the defendant contested the ownership and value of the items. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence proving the defendant's intent to misappropriate or the specific identity of the missing items.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 109 k.k.; Art. 110 k.k.: Misappropriation of entrusted property requires proof of intent to permanently deprive the owner; without evidence of intent or specific identification of assets, the claim fails.
Keywords
AI generated
misappropriation of entrusted property
significant value requirement
burden of proof failure
intent to deprive
civil liability dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 109 k.k.
Art. 110 k.k.
Full text
przywłaszczenie powierzonego mienia znacznej wartości