Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 20/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; lower court's conviction under Art. 178a § 1 kk upheld due to procedural error not affecting verdict.

Case Number II Ka 20/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the district court's conviction for theft. The defense argued a procedural error under Article 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the court found this did not influence the final judgment. Consequently, the original conviction was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 636 k.p.k.: A procedural error under Art. 438(2) k.p.k. does not justify overturning a conviction if it did not affect the substance of the verdict.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural error appeal dismissal Code of Criminal Procedure substantive impact court costs theft conviction lower court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.
art. 636 k.p.k.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text