Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 880/22 AI generated

Criminal appeal court acquits defendant on one charge while upholding conviction and sentence on another charge.

Case Number II Ka 880/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Siedlce partially overturned the first-instance judgment regarding the defendant P. L., who was charged with two distinct crimes. While the court found the evidence insufficient to prove the first charge and acquitted the defendant on that count, it upheld the conviction and sentence for the second charge. Consequently, the final ruling dissolved the combined sentence for the acquitted offense but maintained the original penalty for the remaining crime.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 439 k.p.k.; Where procedural errors or factual mistakes do not affect the outcome on one count but do on another, the court may acquit on the former while upholding the conviction and sentence on the latter.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure partial acquittal combined sentence dissolution factual error impact procedural error effect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 8 i 10 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 635 kpk
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text