II K 362/22
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of water law violation for unauthorized landfill causing lake damage and orders fine and restitution.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of violating water law by constructing an unauthorized earth embankment that damaged a lake shore and filled submerged lands. The prosecution argued the defendant intentionally performed these works without a permit, causing significant environmental harm. The court upheld the conviction, imposing a daily fine and ordering restitution to the environmental fund and state treasury.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 475 Prawo wodne; Art. 33 § 1, 3 kk: Unauthorized earthworks causing damage to water bodies constitute a criminal offense punishable by fine and restitution when committed intentionally.
Keywords
AI generated
unauthorized water works
environmental damage
criminal fine
restitution to fund
water law violation
intentional offense
court conviction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 475 Ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2017 r. Prawo wodne
Art. 33 § 1 i 3 kk
Art. 47 § 2 kk
Art. 3 ust. 1 Ustawy z dnia 23.06.1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 111/24
Court convicted defendant of water law violation, applying older law due to leniency principle.
II Ka 805/25
Court upheld conviction for environmental damage under Nature Protection Act and ordered defendant to pay appeal costs.
II K 502/22
Court convicted defendant of water law violation and imposed fine for lake bank damage.
II K 548/23
Court convicted defendant of water law violation and applied older, more lenient statute due to principle of lenity.
II W 339/18
Na podstawie całokształtu okoliczności ujawnionych w toku rozprawy głównej Sąd ustalił następujący stan faktyczny: Współwłaścicielem działki nr ew.