III K 864/21
AI generated
Court imposed suspended sentence with restitution obligation for multiple bank account thefts totaling over 32,000 PLN.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of nine counts of theft via unauthorized bank transfers and imposed a suspended sentence with a six-month reporting obligation. The defendant argued for leniency, but the court emphasized the need for control during the probation period and the compensatory function of criminal law. Consequently, the court ordered full restitution of 32,923 PLN to the victim and adjusted court costs based on the defendant's financial situation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 279 § 1 k.k.; Art. 72 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.: The court may impose a suspended sentence with an obligation to inform the court about the progress of the probation period to ensure control over the offender's behavior and achieve educational goals.
Keywords
AI generated
theft by unauthorized transfer
suspended sentence
obligation to inform court
restitution of damages
court costs allocation
probation period control
compensatory function of law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 279 § 1 k.k.
Art. 72 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 29 ustawy Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 3 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 roku
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23.06.1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 426/22
Court convicts defendant of robbery and theft, imposing combined sentence for recidivist with minor victim forgiveness.
II K 239/14
Recidivist convicted of theft and card misuse; recidivism aggravates sentence; no probation granted due to prior record.
II K 176/15
Court acquits defendant of theft due to lack of evidence and reliance on uncorroborated assumptions.
IX Ka 70/15
Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft with entry, upholding first-instance verdict on evidence sufficiency.