Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AUa 709/21 AI generated

Claim for unjust enrichment dismissed because the insured was not properly informed of the right to return benefits.

Case Number III AUa 709/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the claim for the return of unjustly received benefits. The plaintiff argued that the insurance company failed to inform the insured of the right to repay benefits received in error. The court ruled that without proper notification of this specific right, the claim for restitution cannot be established.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 689 k.c.; Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach; The right to claim unjust enrichment regarding insurance benefits is contingent upon the insured being properly informed of that right.

Keywords

AI generated
unjust enrichment insurance benefits proper notification restitution claim civil code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 689 k.c.
Art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

zwrot nienależnego świadczenia jest uzależniony od prawidłowego pouczenia ubezpieczonego