Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI Ka 402/22 AI generated

Appeal court reduced probation period and ordered damages for theft while upholding conviction.

Case Number VI Ka 402/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court modified the first-instance judgment by shortening the probation period to two years and ordering the defendant to pay damages to the victim. The defense successfully argued that the initial finding of stolen goods was factually incorrect, leading the court to remove that specific determination. Consequently, the conviction for theft was upheld, but the sentencing and civil liability components were adjusted based on the corrected facts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; If factual findings in the first instance are erroneous and affect the judgment, the appeal court must correct them, potentially reducing the probation period and adjusting civil liability.

Keywords

AI generated
theft conviction probation period reduction factual error correction civil damages order appeal court modification victim compensation criminal procedure appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r.
art. 8 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 3 i art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r.
art. 46§1 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text