II Ka 926/22
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; defense arguments rejected; defendant ordered to pay court costs under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft. The court found the appeal arguments regarding legal qualification and procedural errors to be entirely unfounded and without merit. Consequently, the original judgment was upheld in full, and the defendant was ordered to bear all costs of the appellate proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal is dismissed if the arguments are unfounded, and the convicted defendant bears the costs of the appellate proceedings unless exceptional circumstances under Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. exist.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
dismissed appeal
court costs
unfounded arguments
convicted defendant
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 7 w zw. z art. 8 w zw. z art. 12 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 174 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok SA we Wrocławiu z 18.06.2019 r., II AKa 92/19
II KK 135/19
Supreme Court dismissed appeal as obviously groundless regarding fraud conviction despite defense arguments.
II KK 94/21
Supreme Court dismisses criminal appeals as obviously unfounded due to lack of material law violations.
II KK 161/14
Supreme Court quashes acquittal for arbitrary evidence evaluation and invalid witness credibility findings regarding robbery charges.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 29/22
Appeal dismissed because mandatory defense counsel absence created an absolute appeal ground requiring case remand.
II AKa 398/22
Appeal court modifies sentence by removing civil liability order while keeping criminal conviction and granting full cost exemption.
II Ka 561/22
Appeal dismissed; defense argued for acquittal on legal grounds; court upheld original conviction and costs. (16 words)
IV Ka 23/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction due to procedural error in evidence assessment under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
IV Ka 157/22
Appeal court partially allowed appeal on excessive combined sentence, reducing it from 1 year 3 months to 1 year 4 months.