Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 863/22 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's appeal against conviction upheld, but defendant exempted from appeal costs due to indigence.

Case Number II Ka 863/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal against the first-instance conviction and sentence. The defense argued procedural errors and factual mistakes, but the court found no grounds to overturn the judgment. Consequently, the conviction stands, yet the defendant is exempted from paying appeal costs because they were represented by a state-appointed lawyer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. in conjunction with Art. 634 k.p.k.; The appeal by a defense lawyer is inadmissible if the appeal is baseless, but the defendant may be exempted from court costs if they were represented by a state-appointed lawyer.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal defense lawyer appeal indigence exemption state-appointed counsel court costs waiver procedural error conviction upheld

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
§ 4 ust. 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r. w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 438 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Trybunał Konstytucyjny, sygn. akt SK 78/21
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text