VI Ka 348/22
AI generated
Appeal against criminal costs award dismissed; court upheld lower court's decision on defense fees and state fees.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal filed by the subsidiary prosecutor against the first-instance judgment. The lower court had awarded the defendant 1,200 PLN for defense costs and 240 PLN in state fees, reasoning that the prosecutor possessed assets and regular income. The appellate court found no errors in the factual findings or legal application regarding the cost allocation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 636 § 3 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 632 pkt. 1 k.p.k. i art. 640 k.p.k.; Art. 13 ust. 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The court upheld the award of criminal costs to the defendant when the prosecutor has assets and regular income, rejecting the appeal on procedural grounds.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal costs
subsidiary prosecutor
defense fees
state fees
appeal dismissal
procedural law
cost allocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 636 § 3 k.p.k.
Art. 632 pkt. 1 k.p.k.
Art. 640 k.p.k.
Art. 13 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 278§1 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedIX Ka 21/24
Court quashes first-instance judgment regarding one defendant due to procedural error and dismisses appeal against the other.
IV Ka 1515/21
Court partially allowed private prosecutor's appeal regarding excessive compensation amount due to procedural error.
X Ka 844/23
Court partially allows appeal by removing a specific defendant from copyright infringement sentence.
VI Ka 338/20
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted murder despite defense's factual error claims.
IX Ka 4/23
Appeal dismissed; prosecutor's request to overturn acquittal rejected due to lack of grounds under criminal procedure code.