VI K 989/21
AI generated
Court imposes one year and two months of restricted freedom for domestic violence, omitting proximity bans due to victim's continued relationship.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of domestic violence and sentenced him to one year and two months of restricted freedom. Although the prosecutor requested a ban on contact with the victim, the court found this measure unnecessary given the victim's continued relationship with the defendant and her voluntary agreement to remove such restrictions. The decision emphasizes that the victim's conduct and willingness to resume contact rendered the proximity ban non-essential for her protection.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 41a § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.; The court may omit a proximity ban when the victim maintains contact with the offender and does not require such measures for her safety.
Keywords
AI generated
domestic violence
proximity ban
restricted freedom
victim's consent
criminal procedure
prevention policy
contact restrictions
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 41a § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 207 § 1 k.k.
Art. 190 § 1 k.k.
Art. 157 § 2 k.k.
Art. 11 § 2 k.k.
Art. 11 § 3 k.k.
Art. 37a § 1 k.k.
Art. 343 k.p.k.
art. 190 § 1 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 558/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted theft and rejected defense's procedural and sentencing arguments.
II Ka 253/21
Criminal appeal partially allowed; court reduced sentence and merged crimes due to gross disproportionality and legal error.
II AKa 128/24
Appeal against civil compensation for Nazi persecution victims dismissed due to lack of procedural error affecting the verdict.
XI Ka 12/21
Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, upholding conviction and awarding defense fees to the lawyer.
II Ka 88/25
Court dismisses appeal for one defendant due to statute of limitations but modifies sentence for others.