II K 774/19 AI generated

Court acquits two men of burglary and theft due to lack of evidence proving forced entry.

Case Number II K 774/19

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2020-11-19

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court acquitted two defendants of burglary and theft, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove the essential element of forced entry. Although the victim testified that the cell was locked and the defendants broke a padlock, the court found her testimony unreliable and noted the absence of any forensic traces of forced entry. Consequently, the court determined that the material facts required to establish the crime of burglary under Article 279 § 1 of the Criminal Code were not proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 279 § 1 k.k.; Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.: The court must acquit when the prosecution fails to prove the specific constitutive elements of the crime, such as the overcoming of security measures by force, based on reliable evidence.

Keywords

AI generated

burglary forced entry insufficient evidence acquittal criminal procedure reliable testimony forensic traces

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 279 § 1 k.k.

Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.

art. 387 k.p.k

art. 279 § 1 k.k

art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k

AI generated

Attempted burglary conviction with suspended sentence and civil compensation awarded for property damage.

Appeal court quashes first-instance judgment due to procedural errors under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.

Court dismisses appeal for theft conviction, upholding original verdict and awarding state-paid defense costs.

w dniu 20 listopada 2014 roku około godziny 11:30 przy ulicy (...) w O., okręgu (...), działając wspólnie i w porozumieniu, po uprzednim zerwaniu kłódki zabezpieczającej drzwi wejściowe dostali się do wnętrza budynku gospodarczego, skąd zabrali w celu przywłaszczenia elektronarzędzia w postaci szlifierki kątowej marki B., wiertarki marki B., wiertła i mieszadło, cztery rowery, czym spowodowali straty o łącznej wartości 1350 złotych na szkodę M. W., a ponadto usiłowali dokonać kradzieży innych wartościowych przedmiotów z wnętrza budynku gospodarczego, jednak zamiaru swojego nie osiągnęli, gdyż zostali spłoszeni przez Ż. S.,

Full text