Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VIII Cz 355/22 AI generated

Civil appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's decision on payment claim against defendant D.C.

Case Number VIII Cz 355/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court in Toruń dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the regional court's judgment ordering payment. The plaintiff sought compensation from defendant D.C., but the lower court previously rejected the claim based on insufficient grounds. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling, maintaining that the plaintiff failed to meet the necessary legal requirements for the payment claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 315 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.: An appeal against a judgment on a payment claim is dismissed if the appellant fails to substantiate the claim with sufficient evidence or legal grounds.

Keywords

AI generated
civil appeal dismissal payment claim rejection insufficient evidence standard appellate court review civil procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 315 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt VIII Cz 355/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 1 września 2022 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Toruniu VIII Wydział Cywilny Odwoławczy w składzie następującym: Przewodniczący - Sędzia: Małgorzata Kończal po rozpoznaniu w dniu 1 września 2022 r. w Toruniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym sprawy z powództwa (...) (...)z siedzibą w W. przeciwko D. C. o zapłatę na skutek zażalenia powoda od postanowienia Sądu Rejonowego w Grudziądzu z dnia 28 kwietnia 2022 r. sygn. akt I C 930/21 p o s t a n a w i a : oddalić zażalenie.