Court partially allows appeal, acquitting one defendant of hunting offenses while upholding the other's conviction.

The District Court in Siedlce partially overturned the Main Hunting Court's decision, acquitting defendant J. D. of specific hunting offenses while maintaining the conviction against D. G. The defense argued procedural errors under Article 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming the lower court's reasoning was flawed. The appellate court found the procedural defect did not affect the outcome for J. D., leading to his acquittal, but deemed the evidence sufficient against D. G., resulting in the retention of his conviction.