II Ka 653/22
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; first-instance conviction upheld; defendant exempted from costs due to poverty and substitute imprisonment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft and upheld the original judgment. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual mistakes, but the court found no grounds to overturn the ruling. Consequently, the court exempted the defendant from court costs due to his poverty and the imposition of substitute imprisonment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.: An appeal is dismissed when the first-instance judgment is substantively correct, and a defendant's financial inability combined with a sentence of substitute imprisonment exempts them from bearing court costs.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
substitute imprisonment
court costs exemption
poverty assessment
attempted theft conviction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 03 października 2016 r.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 17 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIV KK 176/20
Supreme Court dismissed criminal appeal as obviously groundless due to lack of serious legal violation affecting verdict.
II KK 127/21
Supreme Court dismisses cassation on procedural grounds regarding jury selection and lack of mental health doubts.
V KK 341/20
Supreme Court quashes appeal to allow retrial after finding self-lustration request invalid due to procedural defect.
Related Decisions
AI generatedVII Ka 579/25
Appeal court revoked probation for robbery conviction due to procedural error and excessive sentence.
VII Ka 1040/19
Court partially allowed appeal, reducing sentence and remanding fine assessment due to procedural error.
II AKa 161/22
Appeal court acquits defendants of assault charges but increases their combined prison sentence to five years.
II AKa 279/24
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction and sentencing for criminal acts under Polish Penal Code.
IV Ka 252/20
Appeal dismissed; court upheld significant social harm finding despite defendant's remorse and low financial means.