Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 653/22 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; first-instance conviction upheld; defendant exempted from costs due to poverty and substitute imprisonment.

Case Number II Ka 653/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft and upheld the original judgment. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual mistakes, but the court found no grounds to overturn the ruling. Consequently, the court exempted the defendant from court costs due to his poverty and the imposition of substitute imprisonment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.: An appeal is dismissed when the first-instance judgment is substantively correct, and a defendant's financial inability combined with a sentence of substitute imprisonment exempts them from bearing court costs.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure substitute imprisonment court costs exemption poverty assessment attempted theft conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 03 października 2016 r.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 17 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text