X K 767/22
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of theft and suspended sentence due to lack of assets and residence.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of theft and imposed a three-month prison sentence, which was suspended for two years. The prosecution argued for immediate execution, but the court found the defendant lacked assets and permanent residence in Poland, rendering immediate execution illogical. Consequently, the court applied the statutory provision for suspending the sentence execution.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 k.k.; Art. 69 § 1, 2 k.k.; Art. 70 § 1 k.k.: When a defendant lacks assets and permanent residence in Poland, making immediate execution of a custodial sentence impractical, the court may suspend the sentence execution under the relevant provisions.
Keywords
AI generated
theft conviction
suspended sentence
lack of assets
no permanent residence
custodial penalty
probation period
court reasoning
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 k.k.
Art. 69 § 1 k.k.
Art. 69 § 2 k.k.
Art. 70 § 1 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 278 § 1 k.k
art. 70 § 1 k.k
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k
art. 387 k.p.k
art. 72 § 1 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 185/23
Court convicted defendant of theft with recidivism, sentencing to one year imprisonment and ordering restitution.
II AKa 457/23
Wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie z dnia 13 września 2023 r.
VI Ka 1236/24
Court quashes first-instance acquittal due to procedural errors and factual mistakes affecting the verdict.
II AKa 377/22
Court reduces compensation for wrongful police detention by correcting factual errors regarding the detention's legality and duration.
VII K 240/17
Sąd Rejonowy dokonał następującej oceny zebranego w sprawie materiału dowodowego i zważył co następuje: Sąd uznał za wiarygodne wyjaśnienia oskarżonej przyznającej się do winy złożone w postępowaniu przygotowawczym. Korespondują one z zeznaniami pokrzywdzonego.