Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 659/22 AI generated

Appeal against criminal judgment dismissed; costs awarded to State from accessory prosecutors.

Case Number II Ka 659/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce dismissed the appeals filed by two accessory prosecutors against the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of theft. The court found no errors in the qualification of the crime or the procedural conduct that could affect the verdict. Consequently, the original judgment was upheld, and the prosecutors were ordered to pay the court costs for the appeal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 1, 1a, 2 k.p.k.; Art. 633 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 636 § 2 k.p.k.; Appeals based on errors in legal qualification or procedural violations are rejected if the original judgment remains substantively correct and the appeal does not reveal grounds for reversal.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal accessory prosecutor legal qualification error procedural violation court costs dismissal of appeal theft conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 1a k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 633 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text