Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I Ca 195/22 AI generated

Failure to send written notice of insurance claim denial does not start the limitation period under Art. 819 KC.

Case Number I Ca 195/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for limitation of actions because the insurer had already paid the compensation. The insurer argued that the limitation period had started due to a lack of written notice regarding the claim, but the court found no such notice was ever sent. Consequently, the court ruled that the limitation period under Article 819 of the Civil Code had not begun to run.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 819 k.c.; The failure of an insurer to send written notice of a claim decision does not trigger the limitation period for actions against the insurer if compensation has already been paid.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation period insurance claim written notice Civil Code compensation payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 819 k.c.
brak doręczenia przez ubezpieczyciela na piśmie oświadczenia co do przyznania lub odmowy przyznania świadczenia, mimo wypłaty odszkodowania - nie skutkuje rozpoczęciem biegu terminu przedawnienia przewidzianego treścią art. 819 kc.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

brak doręczenia przez ubezpieczyciela na piśmie oświadczenia co do przyznania lub odmowy przyznania świadczenia, mimo wypłaty odszkodowania - nie skutkuje rozpoczęciem biegu terminu przedawnienia przewidzianego treścią art. 819 kc.