Court dismisses abusive clause claims as they violate good faith and the social purpose of the law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claims based on alleged abusive contractual clauses. The plaintiff argued that specific contract terms violated good faith principles and the social purpose of the law, while the defendant maintained the clauses were valid. The court ruled that such claims must be evaluated against the principles of good faith and the social and economic purpose of the law, finding the plaintiff's arguments insufficient to overturn the terms.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 381 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 382 k.c.: Claims based on abusive clauses are subject to assessment regarding compliance with good faith and the social and economic purpose of the law; if these principles are violated, the clauses are deemed abusive and unenforceable.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Również roszczenia dochodzone na podstawie przepisów o tzw. klauzulach abuzywnych podlegają ocenie z punktu widzenia zgodności z zasadami współżycia społecznego i społeczno-gospodarczego przeznaczenia prawa (tzw. nadużycie praw podmiotowych).