Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 341/22 AI generated

Court dismissed appeals regarding criminal conviction and ruled on procedural costs allocation between parties. The appeal was rejected, and costs were assigned to the parties who initiated them. The court upheld the first-instance judgment on the merits while addressing procedural expenses. The decision confirms that each party bears their own litigation costs unless otherwise provided by law.

Case Number II Ka 341/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals filed by both the defense counsel and the private prosecutor against the first-instance criminal judgment. The defendant was convicted of violating the physical integrity of the victim, and the court found no errors in the legal qualification or procedural conduct that would justify overturning the verdict. Consequently, the judgment was upheld in its entirety, and the court allocated the appeal fees to the respective parties who initiated the proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 1, 2 k.p.k.; The court of appeal shall reject an appeal if the first-instance judgment is correct in its legal qualification and procedural conduct, thereby upholding the original verdict.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure violation of physical integrity legal qualification error procedural error litigation costs allocation dismissal of appeal upholding first instance verdict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text