II Ka 558/22
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against sentence for excessive penalty, upholding original conviction and costs order.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment regarding excessive penalty. The defense argued for a reduction in the fine under Article 438(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the appellate court found no grounds to alter the sentence. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 4 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k. – An appeal based on excessive penalty is dismissed if the appellate court finds no raucous disproportion between the crime and the imposed punishment.
Keywords
AI generated
excessive penalty
criminal appeal
proportionality principle
court costs
dismissed appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 457/21
Court upheld appeal against prosecutor, ordered defense lawyer costs, and shifted prosecutor costs to state.
VI Ka 316/23
Appeal court dismisses joint sentence and terminates proceedings due to procedural error requiring new trial.
II Ka 1/23
Criminal appeal dismissed; lower court acquitted defendant, higher court remands for retrial under ne peuis rule.
II Ka 342/20
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted theft and rejected defense arguments regarding legal qualification and sentencing proportionality.
II AKa 336/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance sentence for attempted murder and theft against defendant J.G.