Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 558/22 AI generated

Court dismissed appeal against sentence for excessive penalty, upholding original conviction and costs order.

Case Number II Ka 558/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment regarding excessive penalty. The defense argued for a reduction in the fine under Article 438(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the appellate court found no grounds to alter the sentence. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 4 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k. – An appeal based on excessive penalty is dismissed if the appellate court finds no raucous disproportion between the crime and the imposed punishment.

Keywords

AI generated
excessive penalty criminal appeal proportionality principle court costs dismissed appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text