II AKa 61/21
AI generated
Appeal court partially allowed appeal, quashing conviction for one defendant and remanding case while upholding another.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal partially allowed the appeal, quashing the conviction against K. S. and remanding the case for re-examination while upholding the conviction against Ł. W. The defense argued for a change in the legal qualification of the joint crime, while the prosecution contended the original assessment was correct. The court found the legal characterization for K. S. flawed but maintained the findings against Ł. W., resulting in a mixed outcome.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 438 ust. 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.: The court may quash a conviction if the legal qualification of the act is erroneous or if there is a procedural error affecting the judgment, requiring remand for re-evaluation.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
legal qualification
joint crime
remand for retrial
partial appeal success
procedural error
conviction quashing
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 280 § 1 k.k.
Art. 276 k.k.
Art. 157 § 2 k.k.
Art. 11 § 2 k.k.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
Art. 280 § 2 k.k.
Art. 288 § 1 k.k.
Art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 280 § 1 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 823/20
Court partially allowed appeal, upholding conviction while correcting procedural errors regarding evidence presentation.
IV Ka 748/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for assault on public transport due to lack of procedural errors.
II K 1089/24
Court convicted defendant of theft and sentenced to four months imprisonment with compensation order.
VI Ka 84/26
Court quashes lower court conviction for drug offenses due to factual errors and procedural flaws requiring retrial.
II AKa 70/25
Wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Suwałkach z dnia 23 stycznia 2025 roku w sprawie sygn.