Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I C 78/22 AI generated

Loan contract dismissed due to abusive fee clauses; partial debt recognized but fully offset by prior payments.

Case Number I C 78/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for repayment of a loan and associated fees against the defendant. While the court acknowledged the validity of the principal loan and the preparation fee, it ruled that the administrative fee was an abusive clause under consumer protection law. Consequently, the recognized debt was fully extinguished because the defendant had already made payments exceeding the total valid amount owed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36a ust. 1 ustawy o kredycie konsumenckim; Art. 9 ust. 1 ustawy o kredycie konsumenckim: The statutory limit on loan costs does not preclude the finding of abusive clauses; such clauses are void if not individually negotiated, and the debt is extinguished if prior payments exceed the valid claim.

Keywords

AI generated
abusive contract clauses consumer credit law loan repayment dispute unfair contractual terms offset of payments consumer protection usury limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36a ust. 1 ustawy o kredycie konsumenckim
Art. 9 ust. 1 ustawy o kredycie konsumenckim
Art. 359 § 1 k.c.
Art. 359 § 2 ust. 1 k.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 339 § 1 k.p.c
art. 339 k.p.c
art. 339 § 2 k.p.c
art. 720 k.c
art. 359 § 1 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Łodzi z dnia 19 lipca 2019 r.
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 15 października 2020 r.
wyrok Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 26 marca 2020 r.
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text