II Ka 458/22
AI generated
Court dismissed prosecutor's appeal on factual errors, upholding original conviction for attempted theft.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce upheld the first-instance conviction for attempted theft against the defendant M. G. The prosecutor appealed, alleging factual errors in the lower court's findings under Article 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court found no evidence of such errors and rejected the prosecutor's request to change the verdict.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 616 § 1 k.p.k.; The appellate court must reject an appeal based on alleged factual errors if the lower court's findings are supported by evidence and do not affect the verdict.
Keywords
AI generated
Code of Criminal Procedure
factual errors
appeal against conviction
attempted theft
prosecutor appeal
upholding verdict
legal costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 616 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 612/20
Court dismisses appeal against criminal conviction for theft and fraud, upholding first-instance judgment.
II Ka 406/24
Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's appeal on legal qualification and procedural errors rejected by district court.
II AKa 263/24
Appellate court quashes lower court verdict due to factual errors and procedural violations affecting the judgment.
II Ka 614/22
Appeal against sentence upheld; costs borne by state due to public prosecutor's appeal.
IV Ka 807/22
Appeal dismissed; defendant's defense rejected; first-instance judgment upheld on procedural grounds.