II Ka 411/22
AI generated
Court dismisses appeal on criminal charges but awards state funds for defense counsel fees.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance criminal judgment regarding multiple charges. While the substantive criminal verdict was upheld, the court ruled in favor of the defense team's request for state funding. The decision was based on the defendant's financial situation and the necessity of state-funded legal representation during the appeal proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 29 ust. 2 Prawo o adwokaturze; § 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 w zw. z § 4 ust. 1 i 3 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości: The state must reimburse defense costs for state-funded lawyers when the defendant's financial circumstances justify such assistance.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
state funded defense
legal aid reimbursement
financial circumstances
court costs waiver
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 29 ust. 2 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 w zw. z § 4 ust. 1 i 3 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r. w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej udzielonej przez adwokata z urzędu
art. 624 kpk
art. 634 kpk
art. 244 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 1138/19
Criminal appeal court partially quashes first instance verdict regarding facts and sentencing for co-defendants.
II Ka 706/22
Court reduces sentence from 12 to 6 months and removes recidivism aggravation due to procedural error.
IV Ka 295/21
Court allows appeal by changing verdict due to factual error regarding defendant's intent to steal a vehicle.
VI Ka 396/21
Court upheld drug trafficking sentence, rejecting excessive penalty claim due to lack of disproportionality evidence.
VI Ka 489/22
Appeal against conviction upheld; defense lawyer awarded costs; defendant exempted from court fees.